You are not logged in.
I like Pidgin. It's the second best IM client I've ever tried. Still; I want my WLM. I simply find the combination of WLM, msg plus and a-patch to so perfectly fit my needs, that I've just begun running VirtualBox in seamless mode for the sole purpose of using WLM. Granted, I wouldn't have had to if my laptop hadn't been stolen a few days ago, but still.
Now; are any of you doing something completely wasteful/unnecessary like that?
Let em rip!
Edit:
Btw, if anyone hears anything about wine suddenly sailing smooth with WLM9, please do tell.
Last edited by Savonlinna (2009-11-04 02:31:07)
"History is the fiction we invent to persuade ourselves that events are knowable and that life has order and direction."
Offline
I use XChat and Pidgin at the same time all the time, but I don't find it too wasteful. I guess you could say I'm wasteful in how I have several virtual systems I never use. 
Toadsworth on #crunchbang
Offline
Actually, computers today are generally powerful enough by far to let you "waste" a bit of RAM, but still ^^
"History is the fiction we invent to persuade ourselves that events are knowable and that life has order and direction."
Offline
running eclipse, gcc & gdb in cygwin in an XP pro virtualbox, on my Debian sid, 'couse it's a cross-compile env. for the project we do at uni on some board, and the company only has a win binary download on their website. 
Last edited by alon_h (2009-11-05 20:53:05)
Offline
if only fring were on linux (or PC at all), then i'd have all my protocols i use covered.
~ think ~
i have chosen to commit to bedrocklinux.
remember aaron | bad-systemdoze! | without a shot fired
Community #!
Offline
Copyright © 2012 CrunchBang Linux.
Proudly powered by Debian. Hosted by Linode.
Debian is a registered trademark of Software in the Public Interest, Inc.