You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
what do you gather from this:
As for the seedboxes, I opted to use rtorrent on CrunchBang’s existing file servers. I have set-up the rtorrent instances to run as services with GNU Screen. I have not fully tested the set-up yet, but I think I have it all configured correctly — I guess I will found out when the next Statler images are ready, which should be within a couple of days.
taken from http://corenominal.org/2010/12/05/opent … runchbang/
Asus 1001PX: Debian 6.0.7
HP ProLiant MicroServer: Debian 6.0.7
Lenovo E330: Crunchbang 11
Offline
sounds like he's about to launch the next statler revision, and is preparing torrent servers to handle the traffic. exceptional planning.
i've got a seedbox up and running and will start seeding as soon as i see a new image become available.
NOTICE: alloc: /dev/null: filesystem full
Offline
On both fronts--the tracker/torrent and the new release--this is very exciting news. I'll be putting it up on my home server/seedbox. Demand for A2 is still kicking strong (my ratio on it is over 40) so I can't imagine this wont be a hit.
IRC: PizzaAndWine Script bits: Incremental Backup | Sleep Timer
Offline
Well I know what is going on my other HDD, and I wish I could host a seedbox and spread this greatness =[
#!CrunchBang Linux ~$ apt-get into it | #!(Statler:R20101205): OpenBox | Like To Program?
“The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity.”
Offline
O_o
... and a kind word. -Duke
Offline
sounds like we will all be happy kids before christmas 
+1 for official torrents.
luc
Offline
This was the news I was waiting for. I will have to put the new CrunchBang through its paces.
Offline
On both fronts--the tracker/torrent and the new release--this is very exciting news. I'll be putting it up on my home server/seedbox. Demand for A2 is still kicking strong (my ratio on it is over 40) so I can't imagine this wont be a hit.
I installed A2 a few days ago on my new computer. Will the new release be different than an A2 up-graded from repo? I was planning to spend a little more time on installing favorite SW and doing adjustments before migrating from the old computer. Should I hold my horses? Do I have to do a clean install?
/Martin
Offline
I installed A2 a few days ago on my new computer. Will the new release be different than an A2 up-graded from repo? I was planning to spend a little more time on installing favorite SW and doing adjustments before migrating from the old computer. Should I hold my horses? Do I have to do a clean install?
Hi Martin, only one person knows the answer to that question at the moment. 
It is probably the next release will not simply be "A2 up-graded from repo" and it may potentially have bug fixes, new features, different default applications, artwork, menus, scripts, etc.
I have always done a fresh reinstall in the past when there is a new release.
But again, I do not know the answers, just an educated guess based on my experience using #! since 8.04. Corenomial historically does not show his hand until it's time...
/hugged
Offline
MartinRF wrote:I installed A2 a few days ago on my new computer. Will the new release be different than an A2 up-graded from repo? I was planning to spend a little more time on installing favorite SW and doing adjustments before migrating from the old computer. Should I hold my horses? Do I have to do a clean install?
Hi Martin, only one person knows the answer to that question at the moment.
It is probably the next release will not simply be "A2 up-graded from repo" and it may potentially have bug fixes, new features, different default applications, artwork, menus, scripts, etc.
I have always done a fresh reinstall in the past when there is a new release.
But again, I do not know the answers, just an educated guess based on my experience using #! since 8.04. Corenomial historically does not show his hand until it's time...
Nail biting times...
/Martin
Offline
/agree
#!CrunchBang Linux ~$ apt-get into it | #!(Statler:R20101205): OpenBox | Like To Program?
“The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity.”
Offline
It would be nice to know if the next Statler images will appear in 2010 or 2011
See: http://crunchbanglinux.org/downloads/statler/20101205/
There are no release notes yet, but feel free to give it a go. 
Offline
Yay! 
/hugged
Offline
Fresh Lightscribes ready to burn too
, good work my man. Please, keep it up!
#!CrunchBang Linux ~$ apt-get into it | #!(Statler:R20101205): OpenBox | Like To Program?
“The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity.”
Offline
@core: Now how is this going to work are you going to make the alpha a "stable" and turn this to "testing"? Or do you not plan on having a "stable" and "testing" option?
#!CrunchBang Linux ~$ apt-get into it | #!(Statler:R20101205): OpenBox | Like To Program?
“The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity.”
Offline
@core: Now how is this going to work are you going to make the alpha a "stable" and turn this to "testing"? Or do you not plan on having a "stable" and "testing" option?
The alpha images are now depreciated and they will be removed from the file servers. The "current" Statler release is r20101205, which as you might have guessed, is constructed from the date the images were built on.
Any future releases will use the same date identifier. I think it is more useful than using "alpha", "beta" tags, which are kind of meaningless. It was probably a good idea to tag the first couple of Debian based builds as alphas, but now that the build process is sorted, it is not necessary.
Offline
I get it, rational IMHO. Thank you.
#!CrunchBang Linux ~$ apt-get into it | #!(Statler:R20101205): OpenBox | Like To Program?
“The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity.”
Offline
The "current" Statler release is r20101205,
So it's a 'release'?
Any future releases will use the same date identifier. I think it is more useful than using "alpha", "beta" tags, which are kind of meaningless. It was probably a good idea to tag the first couple of Debian based builds as alphas, but now that the build process is sorted, it is not necessary.
Any future pre-releases or any future 'releases'?
I mean is this considered 'release' or 'development'? You know, from the point of view of Distrowatch and write-ups.
Offline
corenominal wrote:Any future releases will use the same date identifier. I think it is more useful than using "alpha", "beta" tags, which are kind of meaningless. It was probably a good idea to tag the first couple of Debian based builds as alphas, but now that the build process is sorted, it is not necessary.
Any future pre-releases or any future 'releases'?
I mean is this considered 'release' or 'development'? You know, from the point of view of Distrowatch and write-ups.
It is a release, as in the images have been released and made public. If anyone would like to apply any other labels, that is their choice. 
Offline
Toolz wrote:corenominal wrote:Any future releases will use the same date identifier. I think it is more useful than using "alpha", "beta" tags, which are kind of meaningless. It was probably a good idea to tag the first couple of Debian based builds as alphas, but now that the build process is sorted, it is not necessary.
Any future pre-releases or any future 'releases'?
I mean is this considered 'release' or 'development'? You know, from the point of view of Distrowatch and write-ups.
It is a release, as in the images have been released and made public. If anyone would like to apply any other labels, that is their choice.
Choice, mmm. So all future images released and made public will have that date identifier? This date identifier shouldn't guide people to thinking it's more or less 'release' or 'development', officially?
Offline
corenominal wrote:Toolz wrote:Any future pre-releases or any future 'releases'?
I mean is this considered 'release' or 'development'? You know, from the point of view of Distrowatch and write-ups.
It is a release, as in the images have been released and made public. If anyone would like to apply any other labels, that is their choice.
Choice, mmm. So all future images released and made public will have that date identifier? This date identifier shouldn't guide people to thinking it's more or less 'release' or 'development', officially?
Okay, so I can see this might need some explaining on my part. I will try and publish a more thorough explanation when I get time.
Offline
It is a release, as in the images have been released and made public. If anyone would like to apply any other labels, that is their choice.
Great, my download is at 34% right now 
Adding up the numbers in the release date = 11 (if you ignore the zeros).
So with tongue in cheek my label is "Lizzie'sLegs" - or eleven on the dart board.
Thanks, corenominal, for bringing this superlative distro to us 
Cheers,
A day without chilies is a day wasted
Offline
Adding up the numbers in the release date = 11 (if you ignore the zeros).
So with tongue in cheek my label is "Lizzie'sLegs" - or eleven on the dart board.
I missed a trick there, I should have built the images a day earlier! 
Offline
Pages: 1
Copyright © 2012 CrunchBang Linux.
Proudly powered by Debian. Hosted by Linode.
Debian is a registered trademark of Software in the Public Interest, Inc.