SEARCH

Enter your search query in the box above ^, or use the forum search tool.

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: Help & Support (Stable) » Separate X Screens and OpenBox » 2011-05-27 13:50:38

For now it seems XFCE works.  I'd sorta like OpenBox to work but now it's not as important.  Thanks!

#2 Help & Support (Stable) » Separate X Screens and OpenBox » 2011-05-27 13:13:06

mrmylanman
Replies: 1

Hey everybody:

I have a weird predicament... I am using two screens at work and they have very different.  The nature of my work requires them to be fairly color-accurate, and with the nVidia settings, it seems I need to run separate X screens, rather than Twin View to fine-tune the monitors individually.

So, I set it up to do so in the nVidia settings utility, however now OpenBox only starts on Screen 0. 

I gathered from the OpenBox FAQ that I need to do the following:

# run openbox on the second screen (they start from 0)
DISPLAY=:0.1 openbox
# by default openbox will run on the first screen (screen number 0)
exec openbox-session

But I'm not sure where I should put this.  In ArchLinux I would just use SLIM and put that in .xinitrc, but since this uses GDM I'm not really sure what to do.

Thanks!

#4 Off Topic / General Chat » TV tuner in Linux? » 2011-03-05 15:21:54

mrmylanman
Replies: 1

Hey all,

I used to use a TV tuner in Windows Media Center a lot, and of all the things I do at home, a working TV tuner is the one thing I haven't been able to do so far in Linux.  Granted, it's been about 3 years since I tried last, so maybe more progress has been made, but here's what I'm trying to accomplish:

  • Get a TV tuner with either component or HDMI input

  • Have it work in Linux

  • Some software that I could use to view it in real time (doesn't even need to record; that part's not too important to me).

Reason why I want HDMI or component is because I want to be able to use my PS3 on my monitor without having to switch inputs all the time, or I could play in a 720 window, and still be able to keep an eye on other things.

If anyone has any pointers I'd greatly appreciate it!  I've been looking around and haven't found anything solid yet, as far as hardware goes.  Thanks!

#5 Re: Off Topic / General Chat » Tried to upgrade to Sid just now, didn't work :-( » 2011-03-03 12:09:34

So i just checked again and it worked.   There are still things i just dont get about Debian lol

#6 Re: Off Topic / General Chat » Tried to upgrade to Sid just now, didn't work :-( » 2011-03-03 03:00:52

hinto wrote:

I changed my repos to sid, and use smxi to manage all the updates.
I don't know if it will help, but it makes things easier, like selecting different mirrors, and dist-upgrades, etc.
I haven't updated this week.
-Hinto

Thanks for the tip.  When it didn't work manually, I tried smxi and it still failed.  Hash sum mismatch.  I tried de, us, and ca.  Something may be going on I guess.  I did read somewhere that if your packages are a different version than what's on the mirror, apt will not let you update to that repository... although I could have misunderstood what was going on, because that seems rather odd.

I'll try again tomorrow.  Weird that it worked in the past and won't now.  For my desktop, it was even right after a fresh install.  My laptop's been working with Crunchbang for about a week now.

#7 Off Topic / General Chat » Tried to upgrade to Sid just now, didn't work :-( » 2011-03-03 01:58:49

mrmylanman
Replies: 5

I wanted to upgrade to Sid so that I could have some newer versions of software working and generally just live on the edge, and I am getting a strange error in Apt when I try to update my sources.

W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2  Hash Sum mismatch

E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

I changed the us mirror to de, and I got the same exact error.  I tried doing "sudo apt-get clean" thinking it might be something cached that is screwing it up, but that didn't help.

Here is what my sources.list file is like:

## CRUNCHBANG
## Compatible with Debian Squeeze, but use at your own risk.
deb http://packages.crunchbanglinux.org/statler statler main

## DEBIAN
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free

## DEBIAN SECURITY
deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
#deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main

## DEBIAN BACKPORTS
#deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main contrib non-free
deb http://liquorix.net/debian sid main future

I put it in off-topic for a few reasons, mostly because I imagine upgrading to Sid isn't exactly supported, lol, but also because I did it on my desktop yesterday and it did work.  Now when I want to do it on my laptop, it's giving me a hash sum mismatch.  I had to reinstall Crunchbang on my desktop because I royally screwed up Nouveau on it, and it's giving me the same hash sum mismatch there as well.

Anyone else try this?  Anyone else having an issue?

#8 Re: Help & Support (Stable) » [Solved] How to ensure a driver loads automatically... » 2011-02-27 13:56:17

iann wrote:

The blacklist doesn't 100% guarantee that a module won't get loaded.  A good way is to delete it smile

If you want to run a script as root at boot then you can stuff it in, I think /etc/rc.local.  Take a look in /etc/init.d/rc.local, which is executed at each boot.  Of course you can add any script you like to the boot process by placing it in /etc/init.d and making a symlink in the etc/rcN.d runlevel that you want, probably 2 or 3.

Thanks Iann I added it to /etc/init.d/rc.local at the very end and it works like a charm.  A little slow to connect to networks at the outset, but I think that's the chip more than anything.

#9 Re: Help & Support (Stable) » Statler r20110207, liquorix, and bcm43xx » 2011-02-26 20:05:18

Here's my experience with a Broadcom 4322.  I'm not sure if the same applies to the BCM4312.

I downloaded the Broadcom STA driver directly from Broadcom:

http://www.broadcom.com/support/802.11/linux_sta.php

I then compiled it following the directions in the README file.  The problem is, after i reboot I have to re-blacklist ssb and re-insert the created wl.ko.  Hope this helps, or at least gets your wireless running in the meantime.

#10 Re: Help & Support (Stable) » [Solved] How to ensure a driver loads automatically... » 2011-02-26 19:58:34

Maybe it's a quirk of the Liquorix kernel.  I saw a fix, it involved making a file, /etc/modprobe.d/00local.conf,  with the contents

install ssb /bin/true
alias ssb off

, however ssb didn't seem to be disabled.  The problem stems from the fact that ssb is built into the kernel, and is not a module from what I gather.

#11 Re: Help & Support (Stable) » [Solved] How to ensure a driver loads automatically... » 2011-02-26 18:59:03

Hey snowpine,

Thanks for the welcome and the advice.

I just gave it a shot, and it seems that ssb still loads, even though it is in the blacklist file.  b43 is also in the blacklist file, however that one does remain blacklisted.

Still have to run the script :-(

Any other tips?

#12 Help & Support (Stable) » [Solved] How to ensure a driver loads automatically... » 2011-02-26 18:30:40

mrmylanman
Replies: 6

Hey all,

I recently installed Statler and I am really enjoying it.  Everything starts up near-instantly and my battery life has really thanked me for having something lighter than Gnome running, lol.

There is a problem, however.  My laptop (an HP DV2Z) uses a Broadcom BCM4322 card, and from my experience the sta driver that can be compiled from sources in Debian's repository doesn't work with the Liquorix kernel.

Therefore, I compiled the driver from Broadcom's website (located here.

It compiled fine, and loads fine, however it seems like the ssb driver keeps loading at bootup even though I have it blacklisted.  To circumvent this, I created a script to remove ssb, then insert the required kernel modules, however this isn't a very convenient solution.  Is there a way I can have this script run automatically (with super user rights)?  This is really the only problem I have encountered with #! so far, so I'd hope to have it solved!

Thanks!

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

Copyright © 2012 CrunchBang Linux.
Proudly powered by Debian. Hosted by Linode.
Debian is a registered trademark of Software in the Public Interest, Inc.

Debian Logo