You are not logged in.
give swiftfox a try
Offline
seems interesting... I'll try it out when I'm back from vacation...
I make chaos
Offline
Do the processor optimizations really make that big a difference? Also it seems a lil behind in version.
Note: ** Please read before posting **
BTW if you wish to contact me, send me an e-mail instead of a PM.
Offline
I've used swiftfox for a couple of years now, at first (firefox 2x) it did seem to be quicker, using it on my EEE and desktop. However now with FF3 the gain is non-noticeable. Having noscript running on FF3 makes mine run really fast now
Asus 4G EEE - Crunchee
Dual Core watercooled - Crunch and Xubuntu
2 x Nas with 2tb storage - FreeNas
1x Compaq hp - Xubuntu
Offline
I've never been able to work out if the gain in speed (if any) is worth it with swiftfox. I just stick with Firefox now.
Offline
i immediately noticed faster loading times, even compared to opera!
Last edited by Shinkanzen (2009-02-09 01:44:44)
Offline
I've used swiftfox for a couple of years now, at first (firefox 2x) it did seem to be quicker, using it on my EEE and desktop. However now with FF3 the gain is non-noticeable. Having noscript running on FF3 makes mine run really fast now
I've noticed a marked increase with noscript running as well, it's lighting now...
Arch64/Xmonad | @mo6020 on Identica
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats." - H. L. Mencken
Offline
I've been running Swiftfox as my default browser for some time now. It is much faster than Firefox or Opera.
-Bob-
Ubuntu User #24005, Linux User #480025
identi.ca friendfeed facebook
Offline
Noscript is great on FF3 indeed. Not much difference with Swiftfox though, so I stuck with FF3.
Offline
I instantly thought you were talking about Opera 9 when I saw the title of this post. 
portfolio: http://csmr.kapsi.fi/
Offline
Unfortunately it's only on 3.0.4pre* right now (behind 3.0.6) and the performance gains might not be clear cut. For Eee 901 users, I notice there's no Atom build - would Atom have little to gain?
* Note Swiftfox is supposed to have better protection from buffer overflow attacks so lagging a version or two might be a little less serious than it sounds.
Offline
What about Swiftweasel? Its another optimized Firefox.
Note: ** Please read before posting **
BTW if you wish to contact me, send me an e-mail instead of a PM.
Offline
What about Swiftweasel? Its another optimized Firefox.
well It's a optimized iceweasel... They're not allowed to call it firefox since it's 100% free...:P (debian paranoia and firefox liking their logos)
from the wikipedia entry it seems like it's better maintained.
I make chaos
Offline
i still just use epiphany, with the firefox speed tweaks to about:config its faster than i could ever want.
Offline
firefox 3.1 beta is a lot faster than anything else, and it just as stable 3.0 for me.
Offline
I had a spot of trouble with the Firefox 3.1 betas cos of this bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467747
It was fixed today so hopefully they'll be getting beta 3 out the door soon.
Offline
ah, I didn't notice that, it must have been working in some of the earlier betas or nightly builds when I installed the plugins
Offline
i now use swiftweasel, even prefer it over opera! bye bye my love 
Offline
Fasterfox Lite just went to a new version on March 7 at https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9148
It's strictly experimental but works well on my machines.
Last edited by tnylnxgy (2009-03-09 18:19:21)
Offline
Copyright © 2012 CrunchBang Linux.
Proudly powered by Debian. Hosted by Linode.
Debian is a registered trademark of Software in the Public Interest, Inc.