<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
   <channel>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2008 02:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2008 02:56:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en</language>
      <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
      <title>CrunchBang ~ security</title>
      <link>http://crunchbang.org/tags/security/</link>
      <description>Code, Design &amp; GNU/Linux</description>

<item>
    <title>Malicious Linux Instructions</title>
    <link>http://crunchbang.org/archives/2007/11/28/malicious-linux-instructions/</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:58:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip Newborough</dc:creator>
    <guid>http://crunchbang.org/archives/2007/11/28/malicious-linux-instructions/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[
    <p><a href="http://tombuntu.com/index.php/2007/11/27/dangerous-linux-commands/ " title="Dangerous Linux Commands - Tombuntu">Tom Dryer</a> offers some good advice to novice Linux users concerning the execution of malicious terminal commands/shell scripts:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Don&#39;t run a command if you don&#39;t understand what it is doing and don&#39;t run commands from untrusted people or places. Check with someone you trust if you are not sure, or check out the command&#39;s manual page.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Tom&#39;s advice is sound, but I fear he&#39;s shouting into the wind. I read the same <a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/announcement.php?a=54 " title="ATTENTION ALL USERS: Malicious Commands">Ubuntu forum announcement</a> as Tom and while I&#39;ve always been aware of the issue, it&#39;s worrying to read about it on such a high-traffic site as Ubuntu Forums &#8212; more so considering the site is heavily used for system support/help requests.</p>

<p>I find it funny that some Linux advocates proudly shout about the fact that Linux is near enough immune to virus attacks, yet rarely mention the negative aspects of running such a powerful system. Some of the malicious commands mentioned in the announcement are far more destructive than your average Windows virus.</p>

<p>The most worrying aspect to all this is the potential future implications for Linux on the Desktop. <strike>If</strike> When Linux finally gains real market share, then this type of maliciousness could really explode on the community [<em>quite literally.</em>]</p>

<h3>Not a solution, just an idea</h3>

<p>There isn&#39;t an immediate solution to this problem, there may never be a solution. However, I have come up with an idea that might help Ubuntu Forums to combat it:</p>

<p>The idea would involve Ubuntu Forum users [<em>those wishing to post code or instructions</em>] applying for a &#34;seal of approval&#34;. The application would be looked at by a board/council and a seal issued when the applicant had shown enough evidence to warrant receiving it. Applicants could also submit testimonials from other forum members to backup their application.</p>

<p>Once a seal is approved it would be prominently displayed as an image link within the users profile bar. Clicking on the image would send the visitor to a notice page informing them that the message had been posted by an approved user.</p>

<p>All forum users should be made aware of the seal and its meaning. This could be done on registration for new users and via an announcement for existing members.</p>

<hr />

<p>I&#39;d be interested to know what people think of this. Please feel free to post a comment saying why it&#39;s either good or bad idea. Any technical suggestions about how it would work would also be welcome :)</p>

    <p style="font-size:smaller;">Tags: <a href="http://crunchbang.org/tags/security/" title="Browse all posts tagged with &#8220;security&#8221;">security</a>, <a href="http://crunchbang.org/tags/ubuntu/" title="Browse all posts tagged with &#8220;ubuntu&#8221;">ubuntu</a></p>
    ]]></description>
</item>

 </channel>
</rss>