<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
   <channel>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2008 04:02:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2008 04:02:24 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en</language>
      <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
      <title>CrunchBang ~ launchpad</title>
      <link>http://crunchbang.org/tags/launchpad/</link>
      <description>Code, Design &amp; GNU/Linux</description>

<item>
    <title>Launchpad Got It Wrong?!</title>
    <link>http://crunchbang.org/archives/2008/05/07/launchpad-got-it-wrong/</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 07:09:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip Newborough</dc:creator>
    <guid>http://crunchbang.org/archives/2008/05/07/launchpad-got-it-wrong/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[
    <p><a href="http://madduck.net/blog/2008.05.06:how-launchpad-got-it-wrong/ " title="How Launchpad got it wrong.">Some interesting thoughts</a> about <a href="https://launchpad.net " title="Launchpad">Launchpad</a> by <a href="http://madduck.net/ " title="Martin F. Krafft">Martin F. Krafft</a>. Martin is basically saying that Canonical got it wrong with Launchpad, not because of its closed source nature, but because they missed an opportunity to create a decentralised system:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>What we need is something as slick as Launchpad, and thousands of instances thereof, which all peer with each other, automatically. The information would automatically be mirrored wherever it’s referenced, so the entire cloud would be highly-available and failure-proof.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I agree that this would be great, in theory, and I look forward to testing the system soon, not :) Seriously though, being a member of the <a href="https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-beta-testers " title="Launchpad Beta Testers team">Launchpad Beta Testers team</a> and having used many of Launchpad&#39;s features, I am not sure that Martin&#39;s proposal is even remotely possible &#8212; is it possible to maintain a complex project such as <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/ " title="Ubuntu, Linux for human beings.">Ubuntu</a> without a <em>centralised</em> project management system?</p>

    <p style="font-size:smaller;">Tags: <a href="http://crunchbang.org/tags/launchpad/" title="Browse all posts tagged with &#8220;launchpad&#8221;">launchpad</a>, <a href="http://crunchbang.org/tags/rants/" title="Browse all posts tagged with &#8220;rants&#8221;">rants</a>, <a href="http://crunchbang.org/tags/ubuntu/" title="Browse all posts tagged with &#8220;ubuntu&#8221;">ubuntu</a></p>
    ]]></description>
</item>

 </channel>
</rss>